Is your daily prebiotic harming your gut health? A new look at supplement safety in menopause and what’s optimal
- Tiana MacKenzie
- Dec 18, 2025
- 9 min read
You've likely seen the headlines, heard the podcasts, maybe a friend or someone who pays attention to the health space has told you: prebiotics are the secret weapon for gut health, especially during menopause.
The promise? Better digestion, balanced hormones, even mood improvements. A quick google search will bring up inulin powder on Amazon or other shopping pages, and you’re assured that this is a non-negotiable step to support your gut health.
But hold on a minute! There are a lot of nuances that have not been addressed before confirming if this is the right decision for you.
What if this "solution" was just another ineffective response to sell you something for a problem you may or may not have with a solution that could potentially be doing more harm than good? What if it's actively putting your health at risk?
In this blog post I break this information down for you comparing recent science and honestly, it's time to have an incredibly candid conversation about what's really happening in your gut. Because blindly following advice, no matter how popular the topic or the person who is saying it, is not empowerment.

The research gap
First point to consider: there are no studies specifically examining short-chain fatty acid composition and gut microbiome health in menopausal women. Research may look promising however it is still preliminary with most of it based on animal models. The research we do have comes from younger adults, obese populations, or general aging studies – ideas can be drawn from these studies, but direct application is misguidance as it does not take into consideration the physiological changes happening during your hormonal transition.
This means that when influencers recommend prebiotics for menopause, they're extrapolating from research that wasn't designed for your specific needs. That's not science-backed guidance – that's educated guessing.
The promise vs. the reality in menopause gut-health: what research in women actually shows
If you're navigating menopause, you've heard the advice: take a prebiotic to support your changing gut health. The logic seems sound – these supplements feed beneficial bacteria, which produce healing compounds called short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs).
So what are we missing?
Here is a surprising truth I found in several studies: these supplements often don't reliably increase the beneficial compounds we hope for.
The Tahiri 2001 study followed 11 healthy postmenopausal women not on HRT taking short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides or sucrose (placebo) for five weeks. Magnesium absorption improved slightly in these women, however the study states the that amount of magnesium excreted was equal to the amount absorbed, resulting in a net change of 0.
The Dewulf 2012 study examined 30 obese women (15 per group) taking inulin for three months. The results confirm modest changes in bacterial populations, and minimal metabolic benefits: these included decreased fat mass, however not significant, and slight reduction in glyceamia after an oral glucose tolerance test.
Then we look at the Waitzberg 2011 study, which found that while prebiotic supplementation increased certain bacteria, there were no changes between groups in fecal short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) profiles – these are the very compounds prebiotic fibers are supposedly targeting.
A comprehensive 2022 systematic review analyzing 44 studies on dietary fibers and SCFA production found that the effects of fiber interventions on SCFA profiles were "strictly dependent on the dose, type, and structure of dietary fibers" and concluded that "dietary fibers do not produce univocal significant increase in SCFA levels in apparently healthy adults."
This means that fiber supplementation does not do the same thing for everyone - individuality matters!
If fiber supplementation is not right for you, you're only adding fuel to a fire that isn't burning efficiently – you might get more smoke (more bacteria), but not the health influence you want or need.
When "good" bacteria tips the scales and makes things worse
SCFA’s are not universally beneficial and here’s why:
A 2018 study of 441 adults revealed something counterintuitive: higher fecal SCFA levels were actually associated with gut dysbiosis, obesity, hypertension, and metabolic dysfunction – not better health.
The researchers found that people with the highest fecal butyrate levels had nearly twice the risk of obesity and significantly higher rates of inflammation, insulin resistance, and gut permeability.
Think about it this way: when your gut is already struggling (as many women's are during menopause due to stress, lifestyle, processed foods, or medication history), adding prebiotic fuel might feed the wrong bacteria or create inefficient fermentation patterns that increase harmful metabolites instead of beneficial ones.
The food vs. supplement revelation: optimizing gut health in menopause
I went through a recent 2025 study published in Cell Reports Medicine that revealed something that should fundamentally change how we think about gut health interventions.
Researchers compared obese women following very low-energy diets (~800-900 daily calories) using either whole foods or supplement-based meal replacements. Despite identical calorie and nutrient profiles, the women consuming whole foods showed significantly greater increases in gut microbiome diversity – the key marker of gut health resilience. The supplement group, despite getting all the "right" nutrients in processed form, actually showed a decreased diversity.
The food-based group also showed better preservation of beneficial bacteria. Meanwhile, the supplement group showed concerning increases in bacteria associated with inflammation and metabolic dysfunction.
The takeaway? Your gut can tell the difference between nutrients in their natural food matrix versus isolated, processed forms – even when the supplement label looks impressive.
The emerging safety concerns that you're not going to find on social media
Now, let's get straight to some hard truths that emerged from a recent case report on prebiotic fiber and colorectal cancer:
In 2024 a case study by Yeoh and colleagues detailed a healthy male patient who developed metastatic colon cancer after just two years of daily inulin supplementation – a mere 4 grams, a dose many consider modest. While this patient was male, the mechanism – how inulin can fuel specific types of gut dysfunction and cellular changes – is profoundly relevant to anyone with certain gut susceptibilities.
This is about your unique gut environment and your potential risk if you have underlying dysbiosis.
Let’s remember something – we're not mice! Animal studies do not directly correlate to humans, however they give us clues to the direction scientists can focus research. The Singh 2018 study demonstrated that inulin triggered liver cancer in mice with gut dysbiosis. About 40% of these mice developed cancer when fed inulin-enriched diets.
A 2024 review titled "Colorectal cancer and inulin supplementation: the good, the bad, and the unhelpful" concluded that despite widespread belief in inulin's benefits, clinical trials offer limited evidence of its efficacy in preventing colorectal cancer. More concerning, the review explicitly stated that "recent data suggest that improper inulin consumption may even be harmful for gastrointestinal health under certain circumstances."
What we can consider during menopause
Many women enter menopause with compromised gut health due to years of processed foods, skipping meals, antibiotic use, chronic stress, or underlying conditions. This creates what researchers call "dysbiosis" – an imbalanced bacterial community that doesn't respond to prebiotics the way a healthy gut would.
What's happening during menopause makes this even more complex. As estrogen declines, your gut barrier weakens, and inflammation increases throughout your body.
For women already dealing with the inflammatory changes of menopause, this could mean that the very supplement meant to help your gut is actually adding fuel to an inflammatory fire.
The whole foods revelation that isn’t fun
This is precisely where The Estrogen Project's philosophy truly shines. We champion a foundational "food first" approach, focusing on diverse, nutrient-dense dietary patterns, along with movement, sleep, and everyday habits, things that all shape your unique gut ecosystem.
The 2025 Cell Reports Medicine study showed us something profound: even when calories and nutrients are identical, your gut responds differently to whole foods versus processed supplements. The women eating whole foods maintained and increased their beneficial bacteria, while those consuming processed meal replacements lost diversity.
The inulin found in a Jerusalem artichoke or chicory root comes packaged with complementary fibers, polyphenols, and nutrients that work synergistically. When we isolate a supplement the dosage is much higher than what would be consumed in one sitting and strictly speaking, entirely different.
This can lead to more aggressive GI changes and even discomfort.
We're talking about fermented foods that naturally support beneficial bacteria: sauerkraut, cabbage, kimchi, other insoluble and soluble fibers (found in grains and oats as an example), a rainbow of plant fibers that feed different bacterial communities, and eating patterns that support tissue resilience during hormonal transitions (because how you feel in your body is influenced by your gut).
So here are the questions I’d like you to answer:
When someone recommends prebiotics for menopause, first ask yourself:
Are you eating whole foods regularly, or relying heavily on processed options?
Are you skipping meals or eating erratically?
Are your meals prepared at home or frequently from fast food restaurants?
Did they assess your current gut health status?
Do they know if you have underlying inflammatory conditions?
Have they considered your medication history, particularly SSRI’s or antibiotics?
Are they tracking your response and adjusting accordingly?
Do they understand the difference between therapeutic short-term use and chronic supplementation?
Most importantly: Are they considering that you might be one of the women who could be harmed by this approach?
The science of integration
What makes The Estrogen Project different is our understanding of total body and lifestyle integration – there may be a time and place for supplementation, but first I want to help you lay the foundational ground work that positively influences how declining estrogen is affecting your fascial system, your gut microbiome, and your brain simultaneously.
The evidence shows that movement quality directly influences gut microbiome diversity and reduces inflammation. It's about targeted movement patterns that support your body's new language during this transition.
The complexity that requires expertise
The relationship between your gut microbiome, hormonal changes, and supplement responses is incredibly complex. While social media makes it seem simple, the research reveals layers of individual variation that requires careful consideration.
Some women thrive with specific prebiotic interventions. Others experience significant worsening of symptoms. Still others see no benefit at all. Speaking with a healthcare professional that knows you and works with you is critical when making decisions about your wellness. There is no one size-fits-all and individuality matters.
If this article challenged your beliefs and caused you to question social media statements:
Join The Estrogen Project women's group, and continue to receive thought provoking information where you continue to understand both sides of the argument, you can ask questions, get answers, and take control of what is best for your health.
Supporting your functional independence,
Tiana MacKenzie, BSc, MSc(A)PT
P.S. Your gut health during menopause isn't about following the latest trend – it's about understanding the science and applying it to your individual circumstances. That's how lasting change happens.
References
Baker, J. M., Al-Nakkash, L., & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. (2017). Estrogen–gut microbiome axis: Physiological and clinical implications. Maturitas, 103, 45-53.
Bektaş, A., Erdal, H., Ulusoy, M., & Uzbay, I. T. (2020). Does serotonin in the intestines make you happy? Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 31(10), 721-723.
de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, J., Mueller, N. T., Álvarez-Quintero, R., Velásquez-Mejía, E. P., Sierra, J. A., Corrales-Agudelo, V., Carmona, J. A., Abad, J. M., & Escobar, J. S. (2019). Higher fecal short-chain fatty acid levels are associated with gut microbiome dysbiosis, obesity, hypertension and cardiometabolic disease risk factors. Nutrients, 11(1), 51.
Dewulf, E. M., Cani, P. D., Claus, S. P., Fuentes, S., Puylaert, P. G., Neyrinck, A. M., Bindels, L. B., de Vos, W. M., Gibson, G. R., Thissen, J. P., & Delzenne, N. M. (2013). Insight into the prebiotic concept: Lessons from an exploratory, double blind intervention study with inulin-type fructans in obese women. Gut, 62(8), 1112-1121.
Kolobaric, A., Andreescu, C., Jašarević, E., Hong, C. H., Roh, H. W., Cheong, J. Y., Kim, Y. K., Shin, T. S., Kang, C. S., Kwon, C. O., Yoon, S. Y., Hong, S. W., Aizenstein, H. J., Karim, H. T., & Son, S. J. (2024). Gut microbiome predicts cognitive function and depressive symptoms in late life. Molecular Psychiatry, 29, 3064-3075.
Lane, M. M., McGuinness, A. J., Mohebbi, M., Lotfaliany, M., Loughman, A., O'Hely, M., O'Neil, A., Batti, J., Kotowicz, M., Berk, M., Saunders, L., Page, R., Beattie, S., Marx, W., & Jacka, F. N. (2025). Food- vs. supplement-based very-low-energy diets and gut microbiome composition in women with high body mass index: A randomized controlled trial. Cell Reports Medicine, 6(1), 102417.
Linetzky Waitzberg, D., Alves Pereira, C. C., Logullo, L., Manzoni Jacintho, T., Almeida, D., Teixeira da Silva, M. L., & Matos de Miranda Torrinhas, R. S. (2012). Microbiota benefits after inulin and partially hydrolized guar gum supplementation – a randomized clinical trial in constipated women. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 27(1), 123-129.
Oliero, M., Alaoui, A. A., McCartney, C., & Santos, M. M. (2024). Colorectal cancer and inulin supplementation: The good, the bad, and the unhelpful. Gastroenterology Report, 12, goae058.
Singh, V., Yeoh, B. S., Chassaing, B., Xiao, X., Saha, P., Olvera, R. A., Lapek, J. D., Jr., Zhang, L., Wang, W. B., Hao, S., Flythe, M. D., Gonzalez, D. J., Cani, P. D., Conejo-Garcia, J. R., Xiong, N., Kennett, M. J., Joe, B., Patterson, A. D., Gewirtz, A. T., & Vijay-Kumar, M. (2018). Dysregulated microbial fermentation of soluble fiber induces cholestatic liver cancer. Cell, 175(3), 679-694.e22.
Tahiri, M., Tressol, J. C., Arnaud, J., Bornet, F., Bouteloup-Demange, C., Feillet-Coudray, C., Ducros, V., Pépin, D., Brouns, F., Roussel, A. M., Rayssiguier, Y., & Coudray, C. (2001). Five-week intake of short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides increases intestinal absorption and status of magnesium in postmenopausal women. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 16(11), 2152-2160.
Vinelli, V., Biscotti, P., Martini, D., Del Bo', C., Marino, M., Meroño, T., Nikoloudaki, O., Calabrese, F. M., Turroni, S., Taverniti, V., Unión Caballero, A., Andrés-Lacueva, C., Porrini, M., Gobbetti, M., De Angelis, M., Brigidi, P., Pinart, M., Nimptsch, K., Guglielmetti, S., & Riso, P. (2022). Effects of dietary fibers on short-chain fatty acids and gut microbiota composition in healthy adults: A systematic review. Nutrients, 14(13), 2559.
Yeoh, B. S., Gewirtz, A. T., & Vijay-Kumar, M. (2024). Metastatic colon cancer in an individual following prolonged daily inulin consumption. Gastroenterology and Hepatology Advances, 3, 333-335.



Comments